Before you create a case
| Required input | Why it exists | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Prevents evidence from being reused for an unrelated objective. | Assess SME lending eligibility |
| Legal basis | Records the approved processing justification. | Contract performance |
| Subject | Limits the current product boundary to a legal entity. | Example Merchant LLC |
| Jurisdiction | Selects relevant policy and data-handling requirements. | United Arab Emirates |
| Retention | Defines when the case becomes eligible for expiry or deletion. | 180 days |
| Owner | Names the person or integration accountable for the case. | SME lending operations |
Merchant onboarding path
Your first merchant-eligibility case
- 1
Create the case
Use the workspace or Partner API. Clarivy derives tenant and actor authority from the authenticated session or service credential.
Output: Case reference and request identifier
- 2
Confirm the policy snapshot
The active published merchant-eligibility policy is copied into the case with its version and compiled hash.
Output: Frozen control plan
- 3
Add evidence
Upload an approved document, cite an official web source, or attach a result from a configured connector.
Output: Source-cited evidence records
- 4
Work the review queue
Verify reliable proof, reject unsupported claims, or request a specific missing document.
Output: Named review events
- 5
Resolve the gates
Record the rationale for exceptions and complete the required maker–checker steps.
Output: Gate outcomes
- 6
Export the packet
Generate a packet containing policy, claims, sources, review actions, conflicts and decision lineage.
Output: Reviewable evidence packet
Example case boundary
{
"reference": "LOS-2026-000184",
"title": "Merchant lending eligibility review",
"purpose": "Assess the merchant against approved SME lending controls.",
"use_case": "merchant_eligibility",
"subject_name": "Example Merchant LLC",
"subject_type": "legal_entity",
"legal_basis": "contract_performance",
"jurisdiction": "AE",
"retention_days": 180
}Authority fields stay server-controlled
What good looks like
- Every material claim points to an exact source or artifact.
- Unresolved contradictions remain visible.
- AI suggestions never become evidence silently.
- The reviewer and rationale are named.
- The policy version can be reconstructed later.
- Retries do not create duplicate cases or messages.
Continue reading
Core concepts
Understand evidence, lineage, integrity hashes, policy snapshots and decision packets.